[LLVMdev] code-owner sporks

Eric Christopher echristo at gmail.com
Fri Nov 16 10:02:49 PST 2012

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:52 AM, <dag at cray.com> wrote:

> "David Peixotto" <dpeixott at codeaurora.org> writes:
> > I think the main benefit of a scheme like this would be that a pull
> > request tells a code owner which patches require their attention. As a
> > contributor it would be nice to see your patch in a queue somewhere
> > rather than just be buried down the mailing list. When patches are
> > sent to llvm-commits it can be hard to tell if a code owner has
> > noticed the patch because it is a very high-volume list.
> This is right.  The highest barrier to entry for patches is that they
> are not seen.

This is opinion. I see everyone's patches, but my review time is precious
and the patch may not hit the criteria of what I'm willing to spend my time

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121116/df1c9aae/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list