[LLVMdev] Enhancing TableGen

Jakob Stoklund Olesen stoklund at 2pi.dk
Mon Oct 10 20:24:27 PDT 2011

On Oct 10, 2011, at 2:15 PM, David A. Greene wrote:

> Now I'm baffled.  Do you object to the for loop in general or just doing
> it before 3.0?

In light of your recent embafflement, I think it is best if we take small steps.

Please confirm that you have understood the message from Evan and me that we disagree with the general direction of removing redundancy from instruction definitions, and that your patches to that effect will be rejected.


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list