[LLVMdev] Enhancing TableGen

David A. Greene greened at obbligato.org
Mon Oct 10 14:15:21 PDT 2011

Jakob Stoklund Olesen <jolesen at apple.com> writes:

> On Oct 10, 2011, at 7:21 AM, David A. Greene wrote:
>> Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> writes:
>>> As the release enginerd, I would encourage you to hold off any changes
>>> to TableGen until after Friday, if they can wait. :-) Of course, Jakob
>>> gets the final say on whether they go in or not.
>> If I can get the for loop done, it would benefit all targets even if
>> it's just used for top-level defs.  It would be a nice 3.0 feature, I
>> think.
>> What do you think, Jakob?
> Absolutely not.


Now I'm baffled.  Do you object to the for loop in general or just doing
it before 3.0?


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list