[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ...
evan.cheng at apple.com
Tue Jun 10 00:09:30 PDT 2008
I think the "answer" is yes. Given the attributes are a bitfield, it
would be difficult to encode any arbitrary type. I am happy with just
adding sign_ext_from_i1 and zero_ext_from_i1 for now. That's
On Jun 9, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com wrote:
>> Yes, this would be much nicer. The only issue is that attributes are
>> currently a bitfield, so they can't be parameterized. I'd love to see
>> this get fixed.
> Does this also apply to Evan's proposal?
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
More information about the llvm-dev