[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ...

Chris Lattner sabre at nondot.org
Mon Jun 9 22:24:14 PDT 2008

On Jun 9, 2008, at 12:43 PM, <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com 
 > wrote:

>> Yes, this would be much nicer.  The only issue is that attributes are
>> currently a bitfield, so they can't be parameterized. I'd love to see
>> this get fixed.
> Does this also apply to Evan's proposal?

What do you mean?


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list