[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ...
sabre at nondot.org
Mon Jun 9 22:24:14 PDT 2008
On Jun 9, 2008, at 12:43 PM, <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com
>> Yes, this would be much nicer. The only issue is that attributes are
>> currently a bitfield, so they can't be parameterized. I'd love to see
>> this get fixed.
> Does this also apply to Evan's proposal?
What do you mean?
More information about the llvm-dev