RFC: Enable vectorization of call instructions in the loop vectorizer

Renato Golin renato.golin at linaro.org
Thu Dec 19 05:46:04 PST 2013

On 19 December 2013 13:38, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote:

>  Very reasonable, although I think the new name “getFunction” is
> ambiguous. I’d like to keep it as “getVectorizedFunction”, but with a large
> note in the doxygen that if VF == 1, it scalarizes. Same for
> getVectorizedCall().

I agree it's ambiguous, but calling getVectorizedFunction to get a scalar
function is worse, I think... :/

Though I can't think of a better name... If anyone else has a good idea...

I know it's a bit irrelevant, so I'm not strongly bound to it. If others
think this is ok, I'm ok with it, too.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131219/54e77030/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list