[clang] [clang] Lower _BitInt(129+) to a different type in LLVM IR (PR #91364)

[Eli Friedman via cfe-commits]

efriedma-quic wrote:

> It seems to me this is a case where we're trying to work -around an llvm bug? Should we just be fixing that instead?

You mean, revert https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310 ?  Making any changes in LLVM here is painful; I'd rather not revisit that.  CC @hvdijk @rnk

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91364