[PATCH] Implements Parts of Intrin.h
eli.friedman at gmail.com
Thu Sep 26 18:41:24 PDT 2013
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> Because it's already considered a system header, or because it shouldn't
> have warnings?
Because it should already be considered a system header.
> The header does have warnings, because other system headers provide
> prototypes for these intrinsics, and they don't apply static, inline, or
> __forceinline / always_inline.
> We may have only ween warnings as a result of including this file directly.
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote:
>> The "#pragma clang system_header" shouldn't be necessary.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-commits