[PATCH] Implements Parts of Intrin.h

[Reid Kleckner]

Because it's already considered a system header, or because it shouldn't
have warnings?

The header does have warnings, because other system headers provide
prototypes for these intrinsics, and they don't apply static, inline, or
__forceinline / always_inline.

We may have only ween warnings as a result of including this file directly.


On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>   The "#pragma clang system_header" shouldn't be necessary.
>
> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1766
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130926/23ba3e70/attachment.html>