[Release-testers] RFC: Upcoming release schedules and creating a formal schedule for future releases
Sylvestre Ledru via Release-testers
release-testers at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 5 11:34:09 PST 2021
Happy new year!
Le 05/01/2021 à 05:32, Tom Stellard via Release-testers a écrit :
> I want to give an update on the status of the LLVM 11 and LLVM 12
> releases. 11.0.1-final is expected to be tagged this week, along with
> 11.1.0-rc1. Unfortunately, we had an ABI regression in libclang.so
> between LLVM 10 and LLVM 11, so we need to do an 11.1.0 release to
> correct this. This happened one other time where we had to bump the
> minor version to correct an ABI breakage. So, LLVM 11.0.1 libclang
> will be ABI compatible with LLVM 11, and LLVM 11.1.0 libclang will be
> ABI compatible with LLVM != 11.
Do you have the bug number of the ABI issue? I didn't experience it.
> For LLVM 12 the proposed branch date is Jan 26. I'm hoping we will
> have the 2 LLVM 11.x releases done before that.
> In addition to all this, I would like to propose an official
> week-of-the-year based release schedule that we can use for all future
> releases. What I'm proposing is not really any different in terms of
> dates from what we've been doing for the last several years. My main
> goal is just to get this documented so it's clear to the community and
> the release managers what the expectations are. Here is the proposed
> 1.0.0-rc1 4th Tue in January
> 1.0.0-rc2 + 4 Weeks
> 1.0.0-final + 2 Weeks (10th Tuesday ~mar 9)
> 1.0.1-rc1 + 4 Weeks
> 1.0.1-rc2 + 4 Weeks
> 1.0.1-final + 2 Weeks (20th Tuesday ~may 18)
> 2.0.0-rc1 + 10 Weeks (+26 Weeks From 1.0.0-rc1)
> 2.0.0-rc2 + 4 Weeks
> 2.0.0-final + 2 weeks (36th Tuesday ~sep 7)
> 2.0.1-rc1 + 4 weeks
> 2.0.1-rc2 + 4 weeks
> 2.0.1-final + 2 weeks (46th Tuesday ~nov 16
> The release branches will be created on the same day as -rc1.
> If there are no objections to this, I will add it to the documentation
> next week.
I like the approach.
As we have an history of missing the deadlines, what about make it less
specific? (or making it clear that it is just a guidance).
More information about the Release-testers