[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR] control-flow-sink: don't sink non-pure ops with affine-valid results (PR #218216)

[llvmlistbot at llvm.org]

Peruere1828 wrote:

@ftynse Hi, I find that you are a maintainer of core and affine dialect. This PR adds a dialect-specific legality check (`affine::isValidDim`/`isValidSymbol`) and consequently includes an `MLIRAffineDialect` dependency into the generic `MLIRTransforms` library. I'd like a check on whether it's acceptable here. Would you please take a look?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/218216