[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][linalg] Introduce new `linalg.conv` op (PR #117688)

[Felix Schneider]

ubfx wrote:

> In particular, Mahesh [proposed a plan](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-op-explosion-in-linalg/82863/7), and it's natural to assume he would like to follow through on it.

I think the link is wrong, it doesn't point to a plan of Mahesh's. The plan of his that I am aware of is this: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113953#issuecomment-2448219347 which lays out different options of how to deal with the addition of new convolution op variants until the "real" op (which this PR proposes) comes in. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117688