[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][linalg] Introduce new `linalg.conv` op (PR #117688)

[Felix Schneider]

ubfx wrote:

This PR is the direct result of the discourse thread, but there is a reason for why discussion in that threa died down. It's an abstract topic, some "expressed views" are just mutually exclusive and at some point, people need to see how it would look in practice. The goal of this PR is to give the participants a working principle for this new Op and an opportunity to specify exactly how it would need to change for it to work for them. Like you said, the goal is to get buy-in of all parties on the right direction, not proposing the end-all-be-all solution for convolution in linalg.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117688