[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [MLIR][EmitC] Emit private functions as static (PR #78336)

[llvmlistbot at llvm.org]

AlexDenisov wrote:

I agree that it doesn't map directly, OTOH I'm seeing CPP target as an approximation.
Re: different implementation: that approach sounds good to me and totally makes sense.
I don't need this functionality urgently (I can work with a local patch in the meantime), but it would be nice to get static functions in eventually.

Would it also make sense to get this functionality in and then migrate to `emitc.func`? Just trying to avoid this slipping through the cracks 😅 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78336