[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Tue Jan 7 02:35:37 PST 2014


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/19915?compare_to=19909&baseline=17660
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:21

Comparing:
     Run: 19915, Order: 198681, Start Time: 2014-01-07 08:51:11, End Time: 2014-01-07 10:40:22
      To: 19909, Order: 198675, Start Time: 2014-01-07 06:27:12, End Time: 2014-01-07 08:23:05
Baseline: 17660, Order: 195884, Start Time: 2013-11-27 22:43:57, End Time: 2013-11-28 00:31:03

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 13 (20 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 6 (21 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1091 (1069 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-dbl/CrossingThresholds-dbl: 1.67% (1.2658 => 1.2869, std.dev.: 0.0054)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: 1.01% (1.9711 => 1.9910, std.dev.: 0.0007)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: 11.84% (5.2426 => 5.8635, std.dev.: 0.1204)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Puzzle: 8.21% (0.1706 => 0.1846, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3: 7.29% (0.4854 => 0.5208, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-flt/CrossingThresholds-flt: 6.07% (3.5900 => 3.8078, std.dev.: 0.0295)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/perimeter/perimeter: 4.85% (0.3072 => 0.3221, std.dev.: 0.0013)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 4.00% (4.2164 => 4.3850, std.dev.: 0.0065)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert: 3.46% (7.5781 => 7.8402, std.dev.: 0.0034)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: 2.68% (3.7349 => 3.8350, std.dev.: 0.0015)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Packing-flt/Packing-flt: 2.56% (5.1722 => 5.3044, std.dev.: 0.0474)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 2.23% (2.4771 => 2.5323, std.dev.: 0.0096)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel: 1.15% (1.0527 => 1.0648, std.dev.: 0.0008)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -10.89% (50.3638 => 44.8814, std.dev.: 0.5734)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trmm/trmm: -7.27% (3.1731 => 2.9423, std.dev.: 0.0461)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/recursive: -4.70% (2.4109 => 2.2975, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-2d/fdtd-2d: -2.63% (4.5337 => 4.4145, std.dev.: 0.0198)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ffbench: -1.92% (1.4413 => 1.4136, std.dev.: 0.0102)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/datamining/correlation/correlation: -1.80% (2.7181 => 2.6692, std.dev.: 0.0062)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib: 3.67% (0.6412 => 0.6647, std.dev.: 0.0081)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction: 2.20% (0.6322 => 0.6461, std.dev.: 0.0021)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 16.63% (5.9583 => 6.9490, std.dev.: 0.1315)
  MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 13.77% (29.1357 => 33.1489, std.dev.: 0.9939)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 12.75% (82.2592 => 92.7469, std.dev.: 0.2136)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Puzzle: 10.67% (0.1668 => 0.1846, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 8.12% (3.3810 => 3.6556, std.dev.: 0.0487)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp: 6.78% (1.0099 => 1.0784, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-flt/CrossingThresholds-flt: 6.45% (3.5771 => 3.8078, std.dev.: 0.0295)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann: 6.15% (3.8883 => 4.1274, std.dev.: 0.0703)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert: 6.10% (7.3892 => 7.8402, std.dev.: 0.0034)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 4.80% (4.1840 => 4.3850, std.dev.: 0.0065)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: 2.77% (3.7315 => 3.8350, std.dev.: 0.0015)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d: 2.17% (1.5986 => 1.6333, std.dev.: 0.0034)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 1.99% (3.1547 => 3.2174, std.dev.: 0.0222)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-flt/Reductions-flt: 1.95% (11.7894 => 12.0188, std.dev.: 0.0319)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft: 1.89% (3.6501 => 3.7191, std.dev.: 0.0065)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 1.72% (2.4894 => 2.5323, std.dev.: 0.0096)
  MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi: 1.38% (2.6366 => 2.6731, std.dev.: 0.0109)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-dbl/Expansion-dbl: 1.09% (4.9365 => 4.9902, std.dev.: 0.0004)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-stringsearch/office-stringsearch: -20.85% (0.1938 => 0.1534, std.dev.: 0.0075)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-blowfish/security-blowfish: -7.29% (0.3402 => 0.3154, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: -6.39% (1.3676 => 1.2802, std.dev.: 0.0256)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael: -6.20% (0.6882 => 0.6455, std.dev.: 0.0118)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell: -5.91% (2.0207 => 1.9012, std.dev.: 0.0184)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-dbl/LoopRestructuring-dbl: -5.41% (1.3819 => 1.3071, std.dev.: 0.0174)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: -5.24% (1.3660 => 1.2944, std.dev.: 0.0244)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: -4.76% (1.4113 => 1.3441, std.dev.: 0.0260)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan/automotive-susan: -3.87% (1.1409 => 1.0968, std.dev.: 0.0101)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-flt/LinearDependence-flt: -3.21% (1.4074 => 1.3622, std.dev.: 0.0162)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: -2.62% (1.3182 => 1.2836, std.dev.: 0.0077)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: -2.48% (1.3608 => 1.3270, std.dev.: 0.0077)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-dbl/CrossingThresholds-dbl: -1.52% (1.3068 => 1.2869, std.dev.: 0.0054)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -16.99% (15.5356 => 12.8960, std.dev.: 0.2865)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -11.94% (50.9650 => 44.8814, std.dev.: 0.5734)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uudecode/uudecode: -10.72% (0.1035 => 0.0924, std.dev.: 0.0019)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syr2k/syr2k: -4.06% (6.0535 => 5.8077, std.dev.: 0.0394)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/IRSmk/IRSmk: -2.67% (40.4190 => 39.3417, std.dev.: 0.3760)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/doitgen/doitgen: -2.07% (3.6583 => 3.5827, std.dev.: 0.0217)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/recursive: -1.63% (2.3355 => 2.2975, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt: -1.10% (4.1462 => 4.1007, std.dev.: 0.0081)

Report Time: 0.86s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20140107/2d398c73/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list