[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/19909?compare_to=19897&baseline=17660
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:21

Comparing:
     Run: 19909, Order: 198675, Start Time: 2014-01-07 06:27:12, End Time: 2014-01-07 08:23:05
      To: 19897, Order: 198671, Start Time: 2014-01-07 04:17:08, End Time: 2014-01-07 06:03:29
Baseline: 17660, Order: 195884, Start Time: 2013-11-27 22:43:57, End Time: 2013-11-28 00:31:03

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 13 (16 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (11 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1097 (1083 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/InductionVariable-dbl/InductionVariable-dbl: 1.53% (1.2835 => 1.3031, std.dev.: 0.0042)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: 91.71% (0.2691 => 0.5159, std.dev.: 0.0222)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops: 17.93% (7.8544 => 9.2625, std.dev.: 0.1732)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2: 11.20% (1.0101 => 1.1232, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trmm/trmm: 9.56% (2.8961 => 3.1731, std.dev.: 0.1054)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1: 4.19% (0.5636 => 0.5872, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-apml/fdtd-apml: 4.00% (1.2344 => 1.2838, std.dev.: 0.0139)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: 3.60% (12.6450 => 13.1004, std.dev.: 0.1425)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: 2.98% (5.2795 => 5.4368, std.dev.: 0.0210)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: 2.94% (0.6329 => 0.6515, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hash: 2.79% (5.0480 => 5.1890, std.dev.: 0.0470)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: 1.33% (16.5485 => 16.7682, std.dev.: 0.0697)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/Large/fasta: 1.08% (1.3668 => 1.3816, std.dev.: 0.0008)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 42.83% (15.7419 => 22.4848, std.dev.: 2.4816)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: 22.25% (0.4220 => 0.5159, std.dev.: 0.0222)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 12.58% (82.2592 => 92.6080, std.dev.: 0.2448)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2: 9.77% (1.0232 => 1.1232, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trmm/trmm: 9.64% (2.8940 => 3.1731, std.dev.: 0.1054)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 8.06% (3.3810 => 3.6536, std.dev.: 0.0801)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 6.69% (2.8130 => 3.0013, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: 5.53% (3.4258 => 3.6151, std.dev.: 0.0727)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: 4.06% (0.6261 => 0.6515, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: 3.59% (5.2486 => 5.4368, std.dev.: 0.0210)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 3.43% (0.8745 => 0.9045, std.dev.: 0.0087)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-apml/fdtd-apml: 3.01% (1.2463 => 1.2838, std.dev.: 0.0139)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d: 2.52% (1.5986 => 1.6389, std.dev.: 0.0136)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: 2.42% (3.4043 => 3.4867, std.dev.: 0.0252)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-flt/Reductions-flt: 1.58% (11.7894 => 11.9761, std.dev.: 0.0453)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 1.20% (3.1547 => 3.1926, std.dev.: 0.0138)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: -6.11% (1.3676 => 1.2840, std.dev.: 0.0284)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-dbl/ControlFlow-dbl: -5.57% (1.5305 => 1.4453, std.dev.: 0.0292)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-dbl/LoopRestructuring-dbl: -5.02% (1.3819 => 1.3125, std.dev.: 0.0118)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl/Equivalencing-dbl: -4.86% (1.3146 => 1.2507, std.dev.: 0.0127)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-dbl/StatementReordering-dbl: -4.35% (1.2824 => 1.2266, std.dev.: 0.0158)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: -4.05% (1.3660 => 1.3107, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-dbl/Symbolics-dbl: -3.98% (1.3127 => 1.2605, std.dev.: 0.0200)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/InductionVariable-dbl/InductionVariable-dbl: -3.19% (1.3460 => 1.3031, std.dev.: 0.0042)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -15.67% (15.5356 => 13.1004, std.dev.: 0.1425)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uudecode/uudecode: -15.07% (0.1035 => 0.0879, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel: -1.28% (1.0664 => 1.0527, std.dev.: 0.0049)

Report Time: 0.75s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20140107/6594e6b8/attachment.html>