[llvm-dev] LLVM Infrastructure Changes - Moving to Discourse

[Jakub (Kuba) Kuderski via llvm-dev]

>
> I am thinking that it should be it’s own top level category. I would
> imagine that some people may only want to subscribe to that category to get
> LLVM Weekly directly in their inbox. I also thought about as a sub-category
> for Announcements, but it might be too high volume for that category. What
> do you think?
>

A sub-category for LLVM Weekly and other newsletters sounds like a good
idea to me.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 1:40 PM Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Jan 10, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 8:19 AM Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
> LLVM Community,
>
> I just posted a blog post about the upcoming changes to the mailing lists
> and LLVM Discourse forums:
> https://blog.llvm.org/posts/2022-01-07-moving-to-discourse/
>
> I am sure some may be anxious about this change, but I hope we can work
> together as a community to resolve any potential issues or help each other
> navigate this change. I have put the migration to discourse guide that was
> drafted by the Infrastructure Working Group in LLVM Docs, and encourage
> people to add their tips and tricks to help others migrate over.
> https://llvm.org/docs/DiscourseMigrationGuide.html
>
> If you have any questions about the plan, please let me know.
>
>
> My only real concern was this part of the blog post:
>
> "The mailman archives on the LLVM server may eventually be removed,
> but there is no final decision or deadline on this yet."
>
> I hope that doesn't happen, as it would break a lot of links into the
> archives, and I think preserving the history of the project is
> important. Since it would just be static content at that point,
> hopefully hosting it is worth the effort.
>
>
> I see no reason to remove them right now and we may never have a reason.
> It's just disk space on a server.  This would for sure be discussed in
> detail to understand the ramifications of it before a change was made. I
> think I was just trying to avoid saying we would *never* remove them…
> because I didn’t want that set in stone either.
>
> -Tanya
>
>
> - Hans
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20220110/547ab8cd/attachment.html>