[llvm-dev] Interesting puzzle for some openmp guru

[Narayanaswamy, Ravi via llvm-dev]

Our MKL team informed me that we do document this here https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/quick-linking-intel-mkl-blas-lapack-to-r.html

-----Original Message-----
From: Johannes Doerfert <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> 
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2021 5:04 PM
To: pawel.kunio at gmail.com
Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Churbanov, Andrey <Andrey.Churbanov at intel.com>; Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com>; Narayanaswamy, Ravi <ravi.narayanaswamy at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Interesting puzzle for some openmp guru

CC'ing the people that can probably tell you. My money is on the interaction of the GNU/OpenMP compatibility layer in LLVM/OpenMP and some calls getting resolved to the wrong place while others go to "the right place".

I would assume simply telling gcc to use the LLVM/OpenMP runtime might be enough here. Having two OpenMP runtimes used is probably not a good idea even if it "works".

~ Johannes


On 10/3/21 02:53, Pawel K. via llvm-dev wrote:
> Hi,
> Maybe here we could build argument for switching from gcc to clang?
>
> I will test it on clang soonish and ask if its fixable if it happens too.
> Maybe it should be fixed in R or gcc or intel mkl. Idk yet.
>
> Would some openmp in clang guru wanna have a peek at this "issue" with 
> openmp around r and intel mkl lib on gcc?
>
> https://www.jyotirmoy.net/posts/2021-10-03-r-mkl-openmp.html
>
> Best regards,
> Pawel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev