[llvm-dev] IMPORTANT: LLVM Bugzilla migration
Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Nov 23 09:59:35 PST 2021
On 11/23/21 09:42, Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev wrote:
> Right. It turned out that some of the LLVM committers are added as
> "external collaborators" just to the single llvm-project repo. I do
> not know why,
> but this certainly should be fixed.
>
Some people did not accept the invite to join the LLVM organization when
we switched from "external collaborators" to organization membership for
granting commit access, so they are still listed as "external collaborators".
I just resent all the invites that weren't accepted, so people have a chance
to join the organization again.
-Tom
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 8:32 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 8:50 AM Aaron Ballman via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:39 AM Anton Korobeynikov
>>> <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 1) GitHub's search is pretty abysmal, but I was not expecting it to be
>>>>> this level of problematic. Doing a search for something like
>>>>> "attribute" to see what kind of attribute-related bugs are open is
>>>>> trivial in Bugzilla and utterly useless in GitHub. I'm guessing this
>>>>> wasn't expected, but I'm wondering if there's anything to be done
>>>>> about it?
>>>> We can try to report this issue to github folks and see what could be
>>>> done. Maybe it's a matter of some text index to be rebuilt.
>>>
>>> Thanks! I'm hopeful that we can find a solution because this is almost
>>> a show-stopper for me. I've spent several weeks going through Bugzilla
>>> to triage C++20-specific issues and as best I can tell, GitHub would
>>> be unable to accomplish this task *at all* (because many bugs were
>>> reported before we had a tag for users to apply and not all bugs are
>>> things that we had bugzilla tags for anyway -- we need a searchable
>>> bug database). So hopefully it's a matter of rebuilding some text
>>> index or something straightforward like that.
>>>
>>>>> 2) It seems that some user accounts are being created as mannequins
>>>>> rather than being hooked up to the actual user. For example,
>>>>> https://github.com/llvm/test8/issues/37237#issuecomment-973565691 is a
>>>>> comment by zygoloid and it is marked as "mannequin" rather than
>>>>> linking to https://github.com/zygoloid. Is that expected behavior or
>>>>> does this indicate some of the data wasn't migrated properly?
>>>> "mannequins" are those who are not members of LLVM organization (they
>>>> will be treated separately after the migration).
>>>> It was also a surprise to me that Richard does not have LLVM GH repo
>>>> commit access :)
>>>
>>> Oh, interesting. Thanks for the explanation
>>
>>
>> It looks like Richard Smith, under zygoloid, does have LLVM GH repo commit access, though? eg: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commits?author=zygoloid
>>
>> So it seems maybe there are people with commit access but are not part of the "LLVM organization" on github?
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ~Aaron
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
>>>> Department of Statistical Modelling, Saint Petersburg State University
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
> Department of Statistical Modelling, Saint Petersburg State University
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list