[llvm-dev] [EXTERNAL] [RFC] [llvm-cov] Renaming option -name-whitelist to -name-allowlist in llvm-cov

[Zarko Todorovski via llvm-dev]

Thanks, yes I've also included changing "whitelist_fun" to "allowlist_fun"
in the above patch.

On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 16:23, Phipps, Alan <a-phipps at ti.com> wrote:

> +1 - I made the same change downstream and was looking to upstream it, but
> you beat me to it.  Will you also do this for the “whitelist_fun” line
> prefix?
>
>
>
> -Alan
>
>
>
> *From:* llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> *On Behalf Of *Zarko
> Todorovski via llvm-dev
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 9, 2021 1:17 PM
> *To:* llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [llvm-dev] [RFC] [llvm-cov] Renaming option
> -name-whitelist to -name-allowlist in llvm-cov
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I have recently been working on a few inclusive language patches. One such
> patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112816 proposes to change the option
> name for llvm-cov from -name-whitelist to -name-allowlist.
>
>
>
> Following up on the reviewer comment:
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D112816#3103937, I plan to mark the
> -name-whitelist as a hidden option with comments in its description stating
> it will be deprecated and replaced with -name-allowlist in a future release.
>
>
>
> Looking for feedback on this proposal.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Zarko
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20211109/69ed75ab/attachment.html>