[llvm-dev] "[NFC]" Abuse

David Blaikie via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 17 10:15:00 PDT 2021


Got links to the reviews? Hard to discuss in the abstract.

But generally, if it is intended to change observable behavior of the LLVM
program (if you have to modify a lit test, that's not NFC, if one could
craft a test (that doesn't invoke UB, though that shouldn't be possible
through the command line interface, etc) that would need to be modified
when the patch is committed - then it's not NFC).

But I think it's important that NFC is about intent, not about the reality
of what the patch ends up doing - so we can't judge an NFC patch by whether
it causes a regression later - the NFC marker is there to say "I don't
intend this to cause any observable change, if you observe any change,
that's a bug" in the same way any patch description is a statement of
intent and can't be more than that.

On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:11 AM Luke Drummond via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Twice in the last week I've had to bisect crashes in the middle end or
> failed CI
> due to commits marked "[NFC]" that changed something fundamental about a
> public
> API or the format of IR.
>
> While I understand LLVM's always been pretty fluid with API and ABI
> stability,
> it smacks a little when the offending commit is marked "[NFC]".
>
> Can some elders / code-owners comment on the expected threshold for what no
> longer counts as "NFC"? I'd personally like to limit its usage to things
> like
> changing a local variable name, rewording a comment, or clang-formatting
> something - not API, ABI, or IR changes.
>
> All the Best
>
> Luke
> --
> Codeplay Software Ltd.
> Company registered in England and Wales, number: 04567874
> Registered office: Regent House, 316 Beulah Hill, London, SE19 3HF
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20210617/f2731c42/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list