[llvm-dev] Upstreaming question

[David Blaikie via llvm-dev]

Looks like there might just be some confusion over the target being
committed as experimental, versus being entirely out of tree.

I'd suggest waiting to hear back from Saleem/compnerd to check that
confusion's resolved/see what his thoughts are then.

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:51 AM MARUKAWA KAZUSHI(丸川 一志) via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a question about the order of upstreaming.
>
> We've been upstreaming our modifications for NEC SX-Aurora VE to
> llvm and clang following this RFC,
> https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131580.html.
>
> Almost of all modifications on llvm/clang are upstreamed.  Now, we
> are trying to upstream our modification on libraries like compiler-rt.
> But it is paused at compiler-rt, https://reviews.llvm.org/D92748.
>
> Basically, he is saying that VE is not yet an official target, so
> modifications on libraries won't be accepted.  He is also saying
> experimental compiler is acceptable, but our modification for VE,
> experimental compiler, is paused without reasons (IMO).
>
> I appreciate if I can hear what we can do to a next step.
>
> Should I ask to make VE as one of official target before upstreaming
> modifications on libraries?  Or, should I push above patch harder?
>
> Sorry for this kind of generic question.  But, I appreciate any answers.
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> --
> Kazushi
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20210105/0275ead9/attachment.html>