[llvm-dev] Clang 3.9.1 fails to build LLVM 11.0.0
Neil Nelson via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Oct 26 11:41:55 PDT 2020
Not sure we would call that a bug. Looks more like a minor documentation
change to a more recent clang version. I wonder which version that is.
Neil Nelson
On 10/26/20 12:20 PM, Issam E. Maghni via llvm-dev wrote:
> Hi folks. It’s my first time in this mailing list, and definitely not
> the last :)
>
> Recently, I’ve been into bootstrapping compilers. I’ve encountered
> several issues, and will start with this one.
>
> The doc claims that Clang >= 3.5 is required to build LLVM 11.0.0 [1].
> So I built LLVM+Clang 3.9.1, then tried to build LLVM 11.0.0. Doing so,
> I faced this error:
>> no matching constructor for initialization of
>> 'llvm::ValueEnumerator::MDRange'
> (full log here [2])
>
> Don’t worry, I’ve done my job. For a minimal reproducible example, here
> [3] is a script that you should execute on a new Debian 10 system, most
> likely a VM.
>
> [1]
> https://releases.llvm.org/11.0.0/docs/GettingStarted.html#host-c-toolchain-both-compiler-and-standard-library
> [2]
> https://gist.github.com/concatime/6b5b9bcbc91a74b2913234180a29c159#file-log-txt
> [3]
> https://gist.github.com/concatime/6b5b9bcbc91a74b2913234180a29c159#file-build-sh
>
> Issam E.
>
> PS: a feedback too about how I report bugs would be awesome!
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201026/c67391b0/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list