[llvm-dev] TableGen boolean literals: opinions, please

[Chris Lattner via llvm-dev]

> On Oct 21, 2020, at 9:20 AM, Paul C. Anagnostopoulos via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> I need opinions from active TableGen users.
> 
> Does it make sense to add 'true' and 'false' boolean literals to TableGen, for use in assigning values to bit fields? If so, they would be TRUE and FALSE.
> 
> A search of all the TableGen files finds no use of TRUE or FALSE except in tests.

You’re thinking about something like “bit x = TRUE;” instead of “bit x = 1;”?  Is there an advantage to that spelling?

-Chris