[llvm-dev] Commits as new contributor
Stefanos Baziotis via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Sun Mar 1 08:25:34 PST 2020
> Documentation updates should also be reviewed.
Of course, I meant that I'll open a patch in Phabricator. :)
I didn't know about code-review patch, thanks. I'll defer the update of
developer policy until the other patch is committed so we can have a
Στις Κυρ, 1 Μαρ 2020 στις 6:17 μ.μ., ο/η Finkel, Hal J. <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> Hi, Stefanos,
> Documentation updates should also be reviewed. In this case, I think that
> it makes the most sense to reference our new code-review documentation that
> should be committed soon (https://reviews.llvm.org/D71916). It might
> actually be best to remove some of that developer-policy text and simply
> reference the new code-review documentation in order to prevent confusion.
> Hal Finkel
> Lead, Compiler Technology and Programming Languages
> Leadership Computing Facility
> Argonne National Laboratory
> *From:* llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> on behalf of Stefanos
> Baziotis via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 1, 2020 9:58 AM
> *To:* Florian Hahn <florian_hahn at apple.com>
> *Cc:* llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] Commits as new contributor
> Thanks to both! I'll update the docs.
> Στις Κυρ, 1 Μαρ 2020 στις 5:24 μ.μ., ο/η Florian Hahn <
> florian_hahn at apple.com> έγραψε:
> On 1 Mar 2020, at 14:44, Stefanos Baziotis via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I recently was granted commit access, but I'm not really sure what is the
> The developer policy states:
> "You are granted *commit-after-approval* to all parts of LLVM. To get
> approval, submit a patch
> <https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch> to llvm-commits
> <http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>. When approved, you
> may commit it yourself."
> Do I have to send the patch to llvm-commits via email and wait for
> approval even when the patch has been accepted in the reviews (i.e.
> Phabricator) ?
> Approval via Phabricator is fine. LLVM-commits (or the relevant sub
> project list) should always be a subscriber of reviews in Phabricator, so
> the approval is recorded there too.
> It may be worth updating the wording in the docs to explicitly mention
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev