[llvm-dev] Combine TableGen documents?

[Eric Christopher via llvm-dev]

+David Greene <dag at cray.com> as someone who might have an opinion.

I don't have a strong opinion, but if someone wants to try to make the docs
better and more friendly to them I'm totally down :)

-eric

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:24 AM Paul C. Anagnostopoulos via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> I've spent the last few days reading and rereading the TableGen documents.
> I thought I would try to improve the "Language Introduction" and the
> "Language Reference." But now I think it makes sense to combine the two
> documents. It isn't really possible for someone to use TableGen without
> reading both of them. Also, the factoring is unusual in some places. For
> example, the complete list of value expression facilities is in the
> Introduction rather than the Reference.
>
> What do people think of this idea?
>
> One reason not to do it is that it might be a waste of energy: Most of the
> uses of TableGen may already be in place.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Windfall               Paul C. Anagnostopoulos
>       ----------------------------------------------------------
>    Software            978 369-0839
>                              www.windfall.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> My life has been filled with calamities,
> some of which actually happened.
> ---Mark Twain
>
> Guga 'mzimba, sala 'nhliziyo
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200729/fd4bf870/attachment.html>