[llvm-dev] Moving the AVR backend out of experimental

[Nico Weber via llvm-dev]

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 7:05 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 02/14/2020 09:13 AM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote:
> > What do you see as the pros and cons of making it a stable target?  Does
> anyone else have any concerns about doing so?
> >
>
> My only concern with AVR is having active mantainers.  It doesn't seem
> to have had much development in the last 6 months.
>

https://reviews.llvm.org/p/dylanmckay/ looks reasonably active to me. And
it looks a lot more active than e.g. XCore :)


>
> -Tom
>
> > -Chris
> >
> >> On Feb 14, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >> +better dylanmckay address
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:58 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org
> <mailto:thakis at chromium.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >>     Hi,
> >>
> >>     There was a thread a few days ago about the expectations for
> experimental targets. At the moment, the only experimental target is AVR.
> It's been in the tree for a long time now, and generally seems well-behaved.
> >>
> >>     Should we just make it a normal target?
> >>
> >>     Nico
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200214/5c6da520/attachment.html>