[llvm-dev] Moving the AVR backend out of experimental

[Tom Stellard via llvm-dev]

On 02/14/2020 09:13 AM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote:
> What do you see as the pros and cons of making it a stable target?  Does anyone else have any concerns about doing so?
> 

My only concern with AVR is having active mantainers.  It doesn't seem
to have had much development in the last 6 months.

-Tom

> -Chris
> 
>> On Feb 14, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>
>> +better dylanmckay address
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:58 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org <mailto:thakis at chromium.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     There was a thread a few days ago about the expectations for experimental targets. At the moment, the only experimental target is AVR. It's been in the tree for a long time now, and generally seems well-behaved.
>>
>>     Should we just make it a normal target?
>>
>>     Nico
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>