[llvm-dev] Timeout tests timing out

[Dan Liew via llvm-dev]

Sorry I haven't had the time to dig into the issue but it looks
someone else already fixed it :)

On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 21:00, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This'll hopefully be addressed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D92563
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:28 AM Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Ping again. We're seeing this on several aarch64 bots, what can we do about it?
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 21:19, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ping on this - Dan, any chance you could take a look here?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:48 PM Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks at google.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Another case: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/43/builds/810
>>> > shtest-timeout.py seems to be fairly flaky on the clang-cmake-aarch64-quick bot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/43, I get notifications from it fairly often
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:15 PM David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Looks like there might still be some issues with the timeout tests? http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/126/builds/226/steps/13/logs/FAIL__lit___shtest-timeout_py
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 2:44 PM Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> > > One thing we could do to remove fragility in the test is to remove the
>>> >>> > > running of `short.py` in the test. This is only invoked to check that
>>> >>> > > it's possible for a command to run to completion in the presence of a
>>> >>> > > fixed timeout. If we can live without testing that part (i.e. we only
>>> >>> > > test that a timeout can be reached) then the test should be much more
>>> >>> > > robust.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > If you're on board with that, it's a tradeoff I think is probably
>>> >>> > reasonable from a test coverage V reliability V development time
>>> >>> > tradeoff.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Sorry for the delay here. I've put a patch up for review that goes
>>> >>> with this approach: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88807
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev