[llvm-dev] Timeout tests timing out

[David Blaikie via llvm-dev]

This'll hopefully be addressed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D92563

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:28 AM Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote:

> Ping again. We're seeing this on several aarch64 bots, what can we do
> about it?
>
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 21:19, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Ping on this - Dan, any chance you could take a look here?
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:48 PM Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks at google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Another case: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/43/builds/810
>> > shtest-timeout.py seems to be fairly flaky on the
>> clang-cmake-aarch64-quick bot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/43, I
>> get notifications from it fairly often
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:15 PM David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Looks like there might still be some issues with the timeout tests?
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/126/builds/226/steps/13/logs/FAIL__lit___shtest-timeout_py
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 2:44 PM Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > > One thing we could do to remove fragility in the test is to
>> remove the
>> >>> > > running of `short.py` in the test. This is only invoked to check
>> that
>> >>> > > it's possible for a command to run to completion in the presence
>> of a
>> >>> > > fixed timeout. If we can live without testing that part (i.e. we
>> only
>> >>> > > test that a timeout can be reached) then the test should be much
>> more
>> >>> > > robust.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > If you're on board with that, it's a tradeoff I think is probably
>> >>> > reasonable from a test coverage V reliability V development time
>> >>> > tradeoff.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sorry for the delay here. I've put a patch up for review that goes
>> >>> with this approach: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88807
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201203/24c37dd8/attachment.html>