[llvm-dev] Get the delayed-load function binding correctly written into the image executable (dlltool)
Dmitry Mikushin via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 24 03:34:02 PDT 2020
Dear All,
I've been studying the delayed-load (delayimp) pipeline as a possible
backend for the missing RPATH functionality on Windows, by the following
example:
#include <stdio.h>
int __declspec(dllimport) foo(int arg);
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
printf("foo() = %d\n", foo(foo(argc)));
return 0;
}
Both GNU and LLVM implement delayed loading similarly with the dlltool
(yet, LLVM's dlltool seems to have merged into ld-link). Essentially, the
task performed in LLVM's lld/COFF/DLL.cpp or BinUtil's dlltool.c is
two-fold:
1) Generate jump table stub for a delayed-load function (see example below)
2) Generate a trampoline that shall deploy the __delayLoadHelper2 code (see
example below)
Upon the successful binding, the __delayLoadHelper2 seems to write a
resolved function address right into the executable code section:
extern "C"
FARPROC WINAPI
__delayLoadHelper2(
PCImgDelayDescr pidd,
FARPROC * ppfnIATEntry
) {
SetEntryHookBypass:
*ppfnIATEntry = pfnRet; // access violation
}
In order for executable image modification, Microsoft has developed some
fancy functions that temporarily add write permissions to the corresponding
memory region.
Now the question is: the code to be modified is within the jump table stub
that goes into ".idata" section, and it fails to get write permissions:
if ((Characteristics & IMAGE_SCN_MEM_WRITE) == 0) {
//
// This delay load helper module does not support merging the
delay
// load section to a read only section because memory management
// would not guarantee that there is commit available - and
thus a
// low memory failure path where the delay load failure hook
could
// not be safely invoked (the delay load section would still be
// read only) might be encountered.
//
// It is a build time configuration problem to produce such a
// binary so abort here and now so that the problem can be
// identified & fixed.
//
/* Exception thrown at 0x000000013F3B3F3F in dlltool_test_executable.exe:
0xC0000005: Access violation reading */
__fastfail(FAST_FAIL_DLOAD_PROTECTION_FAILURE);
}
So, currently the hard-binding does not work, and gives "write access
violation". I'm wondering what kind of "build-time configuration" am I
missing here?
My test config: LLVM upstream from github, BinUtils upstream from git,
MSVC2019, Windows 7.
I'm posting this also to StackOverflow:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63559263/
Kind regards,
- Dmitry.
$ cat trampoline.s
# Import trampoline
.section .text
.global __tailMerge_C__Users_marcusmae_dlltool_build_import_test_lib
__tailMerge_C__Users_marcusmae_dlltool_build_import_test_lib:
pushq %rcx
pushq %rdx
pushq %r8
pushq %r9
subq $40, %rsp
movq %rax, %rdx
leaq
__DELAY_IMPORT_DESCRIPTOR_C__Users_marcusmae_dlltool_build_import_test_lib(%rip),
%rcx
call __delayLoadHelper2
addq $40, %rsp
popq %r9
popq %r8
popq %rdx
popq %rcx
jmp *%rax
# DELAY_IMPORT_DESCRIPTOR
.section .text$2
.global
__DELAY_IMPORT_DESCRIPTOR_C__Users_marcusmae_dlltool_build_import_test_lib
__DELAY_IMPORT_DESCRIPTOR_C__Users_marcusmae_dlltool_build_import_test_lib:
.long 1 # grAttrs
.rva __C__Users_marcusmae_dlltool_build_import_test_lib_iname
# rvaDLLName
.rva
__DLL_HANDLE_C__Users_marcusmae_dlltool_build_import_test_lib # rvaHmod
.rva __IAT_C__Users_marcusmae_dlltool_build_import_test_lib #
rvaIAT
.rva __INT_C__Users_marcusmae_dlltool_build_import_test_lib #
rvaINT
.long 0 # rvaBoundIAT
.long 0 # rvaUnloadIAT
.long 0 # dwTimeStamp
.section .data
__DLL_HANDLE_C__Users_marcusmae_dlltool_build_import_test_lib:
.long 0 # Handle
.long 0
#Stuff for compatibility
.section .idata$5
.long 0
.long 0
__IAT_C__Users_marcusmae_dlltool_build_import_test_lib:
.section .idata$4
.long 0
.long 0
.section .idata$4
__INT_C__Users_marcusmae_dlltool_build_import_test_lib:
.section .idata$2
$ objdump -d dorks00000.o
dorks00000.o: file format pe-x86-64
Disassembly of section .text:
0000000000000000 <foo>:
0: ff 25 00 00 00 00 jmpq *0x0(%rip) # 6 <foo+0x6>
6: 48 8d 05 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%rip),%rax # d <foo+0xd>
d: e9 00 00 00 00 jmpq 12 <foo+0x12>
...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200824/fa27539a/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list