[llvm-dev] TableGen trace facility
Nicolai Hähnle via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 5 08:37:32 PDT 2020
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 4:04 PM Paul C. Anagnostopoulos
<paul at windfall.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry, I still don't understand. I presume you are talking about the LLVM_DEBUG() macro that is enabled with the -debug option. But there are no uses of LLVM_DEBUG() in the TableGen base files. Wouldn't the base "compiler" have to display the information we're talking about? Or is it sufficient to use LLVM_DEBUG() in the target-specific files?
Trying to interpret what Madhur is saying, maybe adding some uses of
LLVM_DEBUG() to TableGen would be a good idea.
Cheers,
Nicolai
>
> At 8/5/2020 08:40 AM, Madhur Amilkanthwar wrote:
> >Well, I was hinting at LLVM_DEBUG messages. You can pretty much dump all "actions" Tablegen would take to process a .td file, which should suffice, IMO.
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 5:59 PM Paul C. Anagnostopoulos <<mailto:paul at windfall.com>paul at windfall.com> wrote:
> >Your reply suggests that there is a way to see debug messages from TableGen. Is that what you meant? If so, can you explain how that works? (Sorry, I should know the answer to this question, but I'm quite the newbie.)
> >
> >At 8/5/2020 04:15 AM, Madhur Amilkanthwar wrote:
> >>Hi Paul,
> >>If all you care about is debugging then for now we can just emit a few more debug messages which would help to "trace" the flow. To distinguish traces you can prefix it with some known string. I don't think you really need a 'trace' tag in the language spec for this.
> >>
> >>Debugging Tablegen has always been a nightmare and I don't think we can ever reach a stage where we can start a debugger and debug statements in .td files step-by-step. This is far from reality unless we fundamentally change the language.
>
--
Lerne, wie die Welt wirklich ist,
aber vergiss niemals, wie sie sein sollte.
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list