[llvm-dev] Bugzilla OrcJIT Tickets

[Stefan Gränitz via llvm-dev]

Thanks for your attention! We found 7 outdated issues and reviewed 8
more that now describe a way forward.
This was a good step towards overview :)

The remaining long-standing reports gather around 2 hotspots:

Missing functionality and workarounds on Windows: llvm.org/PR25493,
llvm.org/PR41595
In my experience the Windows incompatibilities are hard to tackle. I am
not surprised having a number of permanent tickets there.

C-API bindings: llvm.org/PR31101, llvm.org/PR31103, llvm.org/PR32628,
llvm.org/PR36896

Maybe this is worth a discussion, as I have seen people confused (and I
am not up-to-date either):
* Are the C-bindings meant to be functional for OrcV1 and OrcV2?
* Do they provide full or partial functionality?
* Which parts work, which don't?

Best
Stefan

On 5/18/19 8:02 PM, Praveen Velliengiri wrote:

> Hi Stefan
> Thank you!
> In case, you missed in llvm-dev listing: you can find the proposal
> here : link.
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1202EcXlWMQ8yxu5qD0b5fE0a_kihlcaPNpZo_Jk0YeQ/edit?usp=sharing>
> Thanks for working on summarising the Bugzilla tickets to track the
> recent changes in ORC this is really helpful.
>
>
> On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 21:33, Stefan Gränitz
> <stefan.graenitz at gmail.com <mailto:stefan.graenitz at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     In fact, this is all very good practice in my opinion:
>     https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30896
>     https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22608
>     https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24159
>
>     Back in 2016 I simply didn't know about the Bugzilla tracker.
>     From today's perspective, I think, we should try and revive this
>     spirit and share rough plans there.
>
>     @Praveen very good initiative!
>     https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41075
>
>     @Machiel: This is quite recent, but didn't land after it was
>     accepted. Objections?
>     https://reviews.llvm.org/D61599
>
>     Cheers
>
>     -------- Forwarded Message --------
>     Subject: 	Bugzilla OrcJIT Tickets
>     Date: 	Sat, 18 May 2019 17:47:58 +0200
>     From: 	Stefan Gränitz <stefan.graenitz at gmail.com>
>     <mailto:stefan.graenitz at gmail.com>
>     To: 	via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>     <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>
>
>
>     Hello everyone
>
>     A previous thread about OrcJIT brought up bug reports on Bugzilla. A
>     quick search gives 20+ results:
>     https://bugs.llvm.org/buglist.cgi?component=OrcJIT&list_id=162232&query_format=advanced&resolution=---
>
>     While some of them are obviously outdated (addModuleSet API cleanup
>     [1]), others may actually be relevant again (Small code model?
>     [2]). If
>     you reported one of them, please take the time (some day) and review
>     from today's perspective.
>
>     Are there recommendations regarding Bugzilla reports from other
>     parts of
>     LLVM? Best practices that worked out well?
>
>     Thanks!
>     Stefan
>
>     --
>
>     [1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30896
>     [2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24159
>
>     -- 
>     https://flowcrypt.com/pub/stefan.graenitz@gmail.com
>
>
>
-- 
https://flowcrypt.com/pub/stefan.graenitz@gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190523/4b9f6dea/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190523/4b9f6dea/attachment.sig>