[llvm-dev] Bugzilla OrcJIT Tickets

[Machiel van Hooren via llvm-dev]

Hi Stefan,

As for https://reviews.llvm.org/D61599 ,  I do not have commit access so I
am waiting for Lang or someone else to commit this patch.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41690 .

I can also confirm that this other bug that I reported a while ago is still
relevant with ORCv2: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40074
It is a rather impactful one on COFF/Windows. There is an effective
workaround though.
The COFF side of ORC still needs a few other workarounds to be enabled for
it to work properly. It could use some more developer attention.
One off them I believe is a workaround for
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25493, so that one is still relevant
as well.
I might contribute some more patches in that direction in the future if I
can find the time, though I have limited experience with llvm.

Cheers
Machiel


On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 6:03 PM Stefan Gränitz <stefan.graenitz at gmail.com>
wrote:

> In fact, this is all very good practice in my opinion:
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30896
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22608
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24159
>
> Back in 2016 I simply didn't know about the Bugzilla tracker.
> From today's perspective, I think, we should try and revive this spirit
> and share rough plans there.
>
> @Praveen very good initiative!
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41075
>
> @Machiel: This is quite recent, but didn't land after it was accepted.
> Objections?
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D61599
>
> Cheers
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Bugzilla OrcJIT Tickets
> Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 17:47:58 +0200
> From: Stefan Gränitz <stefan.graenitz at gmail.com>
> <stefan.graenitz at gmail.com>
> To: via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>
> Hello everyone
>
> A previous thread about OrcJIT brought up bug reports on Bugzilla. A
> quick search gives 20+ results:
>
> https://bugs.llvm.org/buglist.cgi?component=OrcJIT&list_id=162232&query_format=advanced&resolution=
> ---
>
> While some of them are obviously outdated (addModuleSet API cleanup
> [1]), others may actually be relevant again (Small code model? [2]). If
> you reported one of them, please take the time (some day) and review
> from today's perspective.
>
> Are there recommendations regarding Bugzilla reports from other parts of
> LLVM? Best practices that worked out well?
>
> Thanks!
> Stefan
>
> --
>
> [1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30896
> [2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24159
>
> -- https://flowcrypt.com/pub/stefan.graenitz@gmail.com
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190519/b22aefd2/attachment.html>