[llvm-dev] Sigh. I’ve been through like 5 mailing lists and got trolled off each one. Let’s start simple

[Praveen Velliengiri via llvm-dev]

https://0x00sec.org/ - I think this *maybe* be a right channel :)
Thanks

On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 at 20:54, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 7:42 AM jon via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Well, now that I googled c function macro, how about we change #define
>> secure to #define encrypt1on, hook it up to letsencrypt, and encrypt all
>> uncompiled and compiled data to the cloud? Using CLOUD ASSEMBLY!!
>>
>> Now that I googled more stuff, my example code is
>>
>> Instead of
>>
>> Static printf(128ptr args){}
>>
>> It’ll be encrypt1on statics printf(128ptr args){}
>>
>> Or even better
>>
>> Secure encryption1on static printf(128ptr args){}
>>
>>
>> 128ptr is a macro that does
>>
>> #define 128ptr (double long *)(malloc(sizeof(double long *
>> NEURAL_ARRAY)); // along with mutliple dimensions
>>
>
> All of this seems like you're looking to change / enhance the C / C++
> programming language. There may be a useful thing here, I'm not sure yet,
> but I don't think llvm-dev@ is a good place to work on this. This kind of
> discussion is better suited to a forum for exploring language feature
> design. It's pretty off-topic here.
>
> I understand xnu is written in c++, is it that hard to rewrite all of llvm
>> in optimized, oh well, since I’ve had the worst day of my life, I’ll call
>> It unidefnet coding subsystem, multidimensional multidirectional binary
>> graphs to simulate a neural network?
>>
>>
>> XNU the OS? It's mostly C. I don’t understand what you’re saying about
>> neural nets.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Xnu the kernel. After im done im going to implement mdmdbt graphs in xnu
>> and try to make it into a secure kernel for server operations unless
>> someone stops me
>>
>
> Again, I feel like this mailing list isn't really a useful one to discuss
> this... Secure kernel programming is also pretty far off topic and so I
> suspect there just isn't anyone who can really comment or contribute. I'd
> suggest finding a secure kernel / secure OS research group or community to
> discuss this with instead maybe?
>
>
> Anyways, sorry you can't find more help here. I don't think anyone is
> trolling you or anything else. Just that this list is mostly folks
> discussing LLVM and neither of these really deals with LLVM it seems.
>
> -Chandler
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190713/5f87c066/attachment.html>