[llvm-dev] storage class 0 symbol is generated for a double constant in COFF-x86-64 object file
Shiyao Ge via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 2 15:33:26 PDT 2019
Hi Reid,
Thanks for filing the CR and pointing out the issue site.
Regards,
Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> 于2019年7月2日周二 下午3:25写道:
> After some investigation, I see that this was unintended fallout from our
> triple canonicalization logic changes. The IR you attached has this line:
> target triple = "x86_64-pc-win32"
> Use a canonical triple instead to get the correct behavior:
> target triple = "x86_64-windows-msvc"
>
> I'll fix LLVM so it treats these the same, but in the meantime, you can
> change your triple to fix the issue. I filed
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42491 for it.
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 5:38 PM Shiyao Ge <shiyao.ge.gracia at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Reid,
>>
>> Sure. Here I attach the trimmed IR(sim_0.ll) which llc.exe takes and
>> produces a 0 storage class symbol.
>> The IR is fairly long but there is only 1 usage of real constant as
>> actual argument passing to function iki_vlog_time() at line 137.
>> The version of llc.exe is
>>
>> $ llc.exe --version
>> LLVM (http://llvm.org/):
>> LLVM version 7.0.1
>> DEBUG build.
>> Default target: x86_64-pc-win32
>> Host CPU: skylake
>>
>> The command I use to produce PE object is:
>>
>> llc.exe -filetype=obj -O0 sim_0.ll -o sim_0.obj
>>
>>
>> Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> 于2019年7月1日周一 下午1:45写道:
>>
>>> I can't speak for what past versions of LLVM used to do, but I can see
>>> that today for this IR, we generate an external symbol __real at 40...:
>>>
>>> declare dllimport void @my_function(double, double)
>>> define i32 @main() {
>>> call void @my_function(double 2.000000e+00, double 2.000000e+00)
>>> ret i32 0
>>> }
>>>
>>> $ dumpbin -symbols t.o
>>> ...
>>> 006 00000000 SECT4 notype Static | .rdata
>>> Section length 8, #relocs 0, #linenums 0, checksum
>>> 76DC4190, selection 2 (pick any)
>>> 008 00000000 SECT4 notype External | __real at 4000000000000000
>>> ...
>>>
>>> If you can provide complete IR on which llc produces a 0 storage class,
>>> that would be interesting, but otherwise there's not much we can do.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 5:59 PM Shiyao Ge via llvm-dev <
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am using the llvm codegen facility (version 7.0.1) to translate LLVM
>>>> IR for different platforms. I have this error particularly in win64
>>>> platform. In my IR code I have such code snippet:
>>>>
>>>> %50 = call i8* @my_function(i8* %48, double 2.000000e+00, double
>>>> 2.000000e+00)
>>>> ...
>>>> declare dllimport i8* @my_function(i8*, double, double)
>>>>
>>>> By passing it to llc.exe, I find following symbol is declared in object
>>>> file's symbol table.
>>>>
>>>> [10](sec 5)(fl 0x00)(ty 0)(scl 0) (nx 0) 0x00000000
>>>> __real at 4000000000000000
>>>>
>>>> which has storage class 0, and it will lead to an error when I try to
>>>> link it with the rest of objects.
>>>>
>>>> obj1.obj: Unrecognized storage class 0 for .rdata symbol
>>>> `__real at 4000000000000000'.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As comparison, I compile an equivalent c file (to my llvm asm file)
>>>> using clang-7.0 and emit the llvm from there. For this particular line, I
>>>> see no difference in terms of syntax, except clang generates bunch of
>>>> function attributes to the function declaration. I pass the clang generated
>>>> llvm asm to llc and find the output object file also has one symbol has the
>>>> same name, but the storage class is set to 2.
>>>>
>>>> [10](sec 5)(fl 0x00)(ty 0)(scl 2) (nx 0) 0x00000000
>>>> __real at 4000000000000000
>>>>
>>>> That will probably resolve the linkage error issue. But I don't
>>>> understand what's the key factor to determine the storage class and what
>>>> change should I put into my generated IR.
>>>>
>>>> Moreover, I looked up the microsoft doc about storage class. The
>>>> storage class 2 is described as "A value that Microsoft tools use for
>>>> external symbols. " It doesn't sound like a symbol represents a
>>>> floating point constant at all.
>>>>
>>>> Due to my limited knowledge of PE COFF and llvm codegen for windows
>>>> platform, I am totally confused here. Any suggestion and hint are
>>>> desperately welcomed!
>>>> --
>>>> Shiyao Ge (Gracia)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Shiyao Ge (Gracia)
>>
>>
>>
--
Shiyao Ge (Gracia)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190702/44dd2292/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list