[llvm-dev] RFC: changing variable naming rules in LLVM codebase

[Zachary Turner via llvm-dev]

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 2:16 AM Michael Platings via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Regarding a plan for conversion, I'm keen to avoid perfect being the enemy
> of better.


It seems a bit early to discuss conversion given there’s not consensus on a
style.  For example:

If we imagine that over time it evolves such that 50% of the variables have
> been renamed to camelBack versions of the type names, then it will look
> like this:


This comment seems to assume that camelBack is the agreed upon style and
all we need to do now is move forward, and I do not believe that to be the
case
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190219/059363ca/attachment.html>