[llvm-dev] Precise meaning of must alias?
Philip Reames via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 11 15:14:58 PST 2019
I find myself needing to ask a very basic question. Specifically, what
do we expect "must alias" to mean in practice?
Consider a simple example:
load i64, i64* %p
%p.i32 = bitcast i64* %p to i32*
load i32, i32* %p.i32
Given two memory locations which describe the two memory accesses of
these loads, do we expect that alias analysis returns MustAlias? That
is, when we have two accesses to the same pointer, but *different*
sizes, does that result in MustAlias?
(Just to be clear, MayAlias is clearly a valid answer. I'm really
asking if we can legally return MustAlias for these.)
I would have said up until recently, that the correct result would be a
PartialAlias, not a MustAlias. However, we seem to be quite consistent
about returning MustAlias in cases where we know the base of the access
is common, but don't know the sizes are equal or even non-zero.
I can see four possible meanings of must alias:
1. A must alias result indicates that the exact same bits in memory are
accessed by both. (This requires both pointer and size to be equal
2. A must alias result indicates that *at least one* bit in memory is
accessed by both. (This allows unequal pointers, and unequal sizes,
but not zero sizes.)
3. A must alias result indicates that the two pointers must be equal
when accessed at runtime. (This allows unequal sizes, and zero
sizes, but restricts the pointers to be equal.)
4. A must alias result indicates that *at least one* bit in memory is
accessed by both, unless one of the two accesses has size 0 at
runtime. (This is the weakest.)
I'd always thought that (1) was the correct answer, but now I find
myself wondering. From the code, (3) seems to be the closest match to
what we actually implement, but we're not entirely consistent there
either. What do others think?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the llvm-dev