[llvm-dev] F18-LLVM: Unanswered but important points

[David Blaikie via llvm-dev]

"parser tree" and AST sound like they're probably the same thing - any
reason to believe they aren't/any distinction between those terms you're
aware of?
(you probably want to CC relevant people from those thread into this
one/whoever you're hoping to address these concerns - mailing lists can be
high volume & people don't always find the threads they would like to
contribute to)

On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 9:14 AM Rajesh K Singh via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> This is regarding recent/ongoing discussions about F18 being merged in
> LLVM.
>
> I was going through these threads, and I found few important points which
> were possibly left unanswered (or I might have missed few threads).
>
>
>
> URL: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2019-December/000120.html
>
> Point: Is (3) AST -> FIR -> MLIR LLVM-IR -> LLVM-IR) in a shape where we
> can generate LLVM IR now? [*1]
>
>
>
> F18 generates parser tree after successful completion of parsing/semantics
> phase.
>
> In the above point ([*1]) AST is mentioned. Do we mean that AST and parse
> tree as same, as F18 does not generate anything known as AST.
>
> If not, are we planning to implement AST generation in F18?
>
>
>
> URL: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137677.html
>
> Point: IR generation still appears to be text string based?
>
> F18 does not generate IR/FIR so far.
>
>
>
> Please enlighten on above points.
>
> Thanks in anticipation.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajesh
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191219/9032d093/attachment.html>