[llvm-dev] MachineFunction Instructions Pass using Segment Registers
K Jelesnianski via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jun 23 17:28:21 PDT 2018
Dear All,
Currently I am trying to inject custom x86-64 assembly into a
functions entry basic block. More specifically, I am trying to build
assembly in a machine function pass from scratch.
While the dumped machine function instruction info displays that %gs
will be used, when I perform objdump -d on my executable I am see that
%gs is replaced by %ebp? Why is this happening?
I know it probably has something to do with me not specifying operands
properly, but I cannot find enough documentation on this besides
looking through code comments such as X86BaseInfo.cpp. I feel there
isn't enough for me to be able to connect the dots.
Below I have sample code: %gs holds a base address to a memory
location where I am trying to store information. I am trying to update
the %gs register pointer location before saving more values, etc.
LLVM C++ codeMachine Function pass code:
MachineInstrBuilder sss = BuildMI(MBB, MBB.begin(), DL,
TII->get(X86::SUB32ri),X86::GS)
.addReg(X86::GS)
.addImm(0x8);
machine function pass dump:
%gs = SUB32ri %gs, 8, implicit-def %eflags
Objdump -d assembly from executable
400510: 81 ed 04 00 00 00 sub $0x8,%ebp
TLDR: I am trying to create custom assembly via BuildMI() and manipulate segment
registers via a MachineFunctionPass.
I have looked at LLVMs safestack implementation, but they are taking a
fairly complicated hybrid approach between an IR Function pass with
Backend support. I would like to stay as a single machinefunction
pass.
Believe me I would do this at the IR level if I didnt need to
specifically use the segment registers.
Thanks for the help in advance!
Sincerely,
Christopher Jelesnianski
Graduate Research Assistant
Virginia Tech
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list