[llvm-dev] Where's the optimiser gone? (part 5.a): missed tail calls, and more...

[Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev]

> On Dec 4, 2018, at 15:11, Stefan Kanthak <stefan.kanthak at nexgo.de> wrote:
> 
> "Daniel Sanders" <daniel_l_sanders at apple.com <mailto:daniel_l_sanders at apple.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Stefan,
>> 
>>> On Dec 3, 2018, at 06:10, Stefan Kanthak via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> "Tim Northover" <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 at 17:37, Stefan Kanthak via llvm-dev
>>>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>> Compile the following functions with "-O3 -target amd64"
>>>> 
>>>> You've been advised before, but you really need to start reporting
>>>> these as bugs[*] if you actually care about them.
>>> 
>>> These ain't my bugs, these are LLVM's bugs.
>> 
>> FWIW, I think you're misunderstanding Tim's intent there.
> 
> No, I understand his intent. I just doesn't align with my intent,
> including the hoops he/LLVM wants me to jump through.
> 
>> He's not saying they're your bugs, he's just saying they need
>> to be reported in the correct place.
> 
> Go ahead, report them there!

I'm afraid I don't have the time to do that. I have my own work to attend to.

> [...]
> 
>>>> [*] https://llvm.org/docs/Contributing.html <https://llvm.org/docs/Contributing.html>
>>> 
>>> | If you are working with LLVM and run into a bug, we definitely want
>>> | to know about it.
>> 
>> The sentence following that one provides instructions on how
>> to report bugs:
> 
> What follows does CLEARLY not apply here and for me: I don't work
> with LLVM, I don't use it!

It applies to everyone who wishes to report bugs.

> [...]
> 
>> You already seem to have reduced test cases (Thanks) so they just
>> need to be reported to the bug tracker.
> 
> Go ahead, report them there!
> 
> regards
> Stefan

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20181204/6bd69cc4/attachment.html>