[llvm-dev] Debug info for Cuda
Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 6 11:56:34 PST 2017
> Hi everybody,
> As you know, Cuda/NVPTX target has very limited support of the debug
> info in Clang/LLVM. Currently, LLVM supports only emission of the line
> numbers debug info.
> This is caused by limitations of the Cuda/NVPTX codegen. Clang/LLVM
> translates the source code to LLVM IR, which is then lowered to PTX
> (parallel thread execution) intermediate file. This PTX file represents
> special kind of the assembler code in text format, which contains the
> code itself + (possibly) debug info. Then this PTX file is compiled by
> ptxas tool into the CUDA binary representation.
>
> Debug info representation in PTX file.
> ========================
> According to PTX Writer's Guide to Interoperability, Debug information
> (http://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/ptx-writers-guide-to-interoperability/index.html#debug-information)
> , debug information must be encoded in DWARF (Debug With Arbitrary
> Record Format). The responsibility for generating debug information is
> split between the PTX producer and the PTX-to-SASS backend. The PTX
> producer is responsible for emitting binary DWARF into the PTX file,
> using the .section and .b8-.b16-.b32-and-.b64 directives in PTX. This
> should contain the .debug_info and .debug_abbrev sections, and possibly
> optional sections .debug_pubnames and .debug_aranges. These sections
> are standard DWARF2 sections that refer to labels and registers in the
> PTX.
>
> The PTX-to-SASS backend is responsible for generating the .debug_line
> section from the .file and .loc directives in the PTX file. This
> section maps source lines to SASS addresses. The PTX-to-SASS backend
> also generates the .debug_frame section.
All this sounds like the standard division of responsibilities between
an LLVM code generator and the assembler.
> LLVM is able to emit debug info in DWARF. But ptxas compiler has some
> limitations, that make it hard to adapt LLVM for correct emission of
> the debug info in PTX files.
>
> Limitations/features of the PTX format/ptxas compiler.
> ==================================
> a) Supports DWARF-2 only.
IIRC, Darwin had a similar restriction until recently.
> b) Labels are allowed only in code section (only in functions).
If you have static/global variables, I guess their locations would
have to be described using a section+offset expression? Normally
we emit a location attribute that is just a reference to a label
for the variable.
> c) Does not support label arithmetic in DWARF sections.
> “.b32 L1 – L2” as the size of the section is not allowed, so the
> sections sizes should be calculated explicitly.
MachO has a similar restriction, this should not be a problem if you
can do something like:
L3 = L1 - L2
.b32 L3
> d) Debug info must point to the sections, not to labels inside these
> sections.
> “.b32 .debug_abbrevs”
Offhand for DWARF-2 I can't think of a reference that couldn't be done
this way.
> e) Sections itself must be enclosed into braces
> “.section .debug_info {…}”
> f) Frame info is non-register based
> Based on function local “__local_depot” array, that represents the
> stack frame.
> g) All variables must have non-standard DW_AT_address_class attribute
> so the debuger had the info about address class of the variable -
> global or local. DWARF standard does support this attribute, but it can
> be appiled to pointer/reference types only, not variables.
For variables it would be more usual to use DW_AT_segment for this.
But that's an agreement that the compiler and debugger need to reach.
> h) The first label in the function must follow the debug location macro.
> In LLVM, it is followed by the debug location macro.
I am not 100% sure what you mean by this, but I think it has to do with
the fact that LLVM attaches locations to instructions, not labels. It
might or might not be easy to work around this; there might be an
unfortunate interaction with how emitting line-0 records works.
> i) .debug_frame section is emitted by txas compiler.
> DW_AT_frame_base must be set to dwarf::DW_FORM_data1
> dwarf::DW_OP_call_frame_cfa value.
I doubt that's a problem.
> j) Strings cannot be referenced by the labels, instead they must be
> inlined in the sections in form of array of chars.
LLVM used to do inline strings, but switched to the .debug_str section
quite a while ago. On the other hand, I spent a little time maybe a
year ago looking into whether we could emit short strings inline as a
space-saving measure, and decided it was feasible. (I didn't do it
because the space savings was really trivial.) So I think doing this
would not be terribly hard.
> Some changes in LLVM are required to support all these
> limitation/features in the output PTX files.
> Required changes in LLVM.
> ==================
> •include/llvm/CodeGen/AsmPrinter.h.
> •Add “virtual MCSymbol *getFunctionFrameSymbol(const
> MachineFunction *MF) const” for non-register-based frame info.
> •Override “NVPTXMCAsmPrinter.cpp” to return the name of the
> “__local_depot” frame storage.
> •Add ”cuda-gdb” specific tuning.
Note that our design philosophy for "tuning" is that a tuning option
unpacks into other separate flags. Not a problem, just an observation.
> •Inlined strings must be used in sections, not string references.
> •Label arithmetic is replaced by the absolute section size
> evaluation.
This one isn't a debug-info tuning decision, it's how your assembler works
and so is a target decision.
> •Use “AsmPrinter::doInitialization()” instead of NVPTX-custom manual
> initialization.
> •Local variables address emitted as “__local_depot” + <var offset>.
> •Add NVPTX specific “NVPTXMCAsmStreamer” class.
> •Requires moving to includes of “MCAsmStreamer” class declaration.
> •Overrides emission of the labels (names of the section are emitted
> instead).
> •Overrides emission of the sections (emit braces)
> •Overrides string emission (as sequence of bytes, not as strings)
> •Overrides emission of files/locations debug info
> Required changes in Clang.
> =================
> •Add option “-gcuda-gdb” to driver.
> •Emit cuda-gdb compatible debug info (DWARF-2 by default + CudaGDB
> tuning).
> •Add options “-g --dont-merge-basicblocks --return-at-end” to “ptxas”
> call.
> •ptxas is able to translate debug information only if -O0
> optimization level is used. It means, that we can use optimization
> level in LLVM > O0, but still have to use O0 when calling ptxas
> compiler.
>
> This approach was implemented in https://github.com/clang-ykt to support
> debug info emission for NVPTX target when generating code for OpenMP
> offloading constructs. You can try to use it.
I haven't looked at your code but all the things you describe seem
reasonably feasible. Certainly the details of what you want to do
to the emitted DWARF are fine; I am less sure about the assembler
details, but if you have a worked example that makes it likely that
part is okay as well.
--paulr
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list