[llvm-dev] Please dogfood LLD

[James Y Knight via llvm-dev]

I agree, it seems like we ought to be installing and looking for lld as
part of the compiler install directory (for example,
/usr/lib/llvm-4.0/bin/{clang,lld}), rather than searching for it in the
base system.

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Ed Maste via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On 16 March 2017 at 02:14, Sean Silva via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > I would not be
> > surprised by older LLD and newer Clang causing issues, but the reverse
> > Should Work.
>
> We'll soon have cases where there will be a LLD 4.0.0 /usr/bin/ld
> provided by the base system, and Clang 4.1.0 /usr/local/bin/clang
> installed from a package. It probably means we just need to have that
> Clang use its own copy of LLD in the same package.
>
> It'll be great if we can detect and error on this case rather than
> producing broken output though.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170316/e81aed27/attachment.html>