[llvm-dev] Please dogfood LLD

[Ed Maste via llvm-dev]

On 16 March 2017 at 02:14, Sean Silva via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I would not be
> surprised by older LLD and newer Clang causing issues, but the reverse
> Should Work.

We'll soon have cases where there will be a LLD 4.0.0 /usr/bin/ld
provided by the base system, and Clang 4.1.0 /usr/local/bin/clang
installed from a package. It probably means we just need to have that
Clang use its own copy of LLD in the same package.

It'll be great if we can detect and error on this case rather than
producing broken output though.