[llvm-dev] CodeExtractor buggy?

[keita abdoul-kader via llvm-dev]

I second this observation.

On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 9:07 AM, serge guelton via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 08:26:18PM -0500, Pei Wang via llvm-dev wrote:
> > Now, because the loop is coalesced into a function, the definition of
> %.ph (derived from %17 in the previous version of IR) in .loopexit becomes
> funny: two different incoming values for the same incoming block. I was
> wondering if this is a bug of CodeExtractor or the extractor makes
> assumptions about the code to be extracted which I’m not aware of.
>
> From my experience, the CodeExtractor is buggy in various corner cases :-/
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171204/40fee40a/attachment.html>