[llvm-dev] [RFC] 'Review corner' section in LLVM Weekly

[Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Alex
> Bradbury via llvm-dev
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 10:02 AM
> To: Hans Wennborg
> Cc: llvm-dev
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] 'Review corner' section in LLVM Weekly
> 
> On 28 August 2017 at 17:49, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Alex Bradbury <asb at asbradbury.org>
> wrote:
> > What I was thinking when I replied to your tweet was something like
> > "bugs filed in the last 7 days which no-one seems to have looked at",
> > or something similar. Hopefully it should be possible to build the
> > list automatically.
> >
> > I'm not sure how large that list would be each week though, or how
> > useful it would be. Also, this might be something we should fix by
> > having a better bug triaging process in general.
> 
> Thanks for the clarification. Trying to improve bug triage problem
> seems like a manageable proposition. I'd guess it's already possible
> to construct a bugzilla query showing bugs filed in the past 7 days
> that haven't been triaged?
> 
> Something like the following?:
> 
> """
> ## Bug corner
> 
> In the past 7 days, XXX bugs have been opened, YYY bugs have been
> closed. ZZZ newly-filed bugs remain untriaged - see <link> to help.
> Thanks to contributions from CREDIT1, ..., CREDITN, AAA out of BBB
> bugs were triaged last week.
> """

As I reported back in June, the overall LLVM open bug count increases
by an average of 4 per day.  I don't know how many of the bugs that
stay open get comments, but this gives you a reasonable upper bound
on the size of this kind of weekly summary.
--paulr