[llvm-dev] Upgrading phabricator

[Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev]

> On Sep 29, 2016, at 11:04 PM, Eric Liu <ioeric at google.com> wrote:
> 
> I've switched the default email format to be plain text only now. This option should be per-user configurable, but somehow it is not shown in the "Settings"; I'll try if I can make the option personalized.
> 
> Regarding new features and bug fixes in this upgrade, I don't really have a list since the Phabricator we are running is the open-source repo + some local modification. The last merge was more than one year ago, so I guess there should be a long list of new features and bug fixes.
> 
> Some new features that I am aware of:
> - Syntax highlighting.
> - Patch size in email headers
> - HTML email (disabled)
> - More compatible with modern arc (the reason for this upgrade)
> - and more to be discovered! :)
> 
> @Mehdi Deleting unposted inline comments works for me. At which patch did this issue occur?

I picked randomly in the “All revisions” list.
(For example: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25094 )

It seems I can delete comment unless I edited it first. Strange…

— 
Mehdi


> 
> - Eric
> 
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 7:39 AM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote:
> One of the new “feature” is that emails are HTML only right now. Not quite nice for the archive (or for interacting by email). 
> See for instance: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160926/172081.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160926/172081.html>
> 
> (Also the funky "[Changed Subscribers] “ in the title)
> 
> Another issue is that we can’t delete unposted inline comment anymore.
> 
> — 
> Mehdi
> 
>> On Sep 29, 2016, at 9:35 PM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> You mentioned this was for an upgrade. Are there any major new features or bugfixes to be aware of?
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:26 PM Eric Liu via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Phabricator is (finally) back online! Let me know if you have any feedback or problem :)
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Eric
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:23 PM Eric Liu <ioeric at google.com <mailto:ioeric at google.com>> wrote:
>> According to top and iotop, mysqld is still working, and the progress bar did move by a little bit, so I think it's just really slow. Apologies if this is blocking you.
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:17 PM Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>> Still no word on when it will be back up?  It's not hung is it?  :D
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:03 AM mats petersson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>> On 29 September 2016 at 16:11, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sep 29, 2016, at 7:21 AM, Eric Liu via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Sorry for blocking everyone for so long.
>> 
>> No pb, thanks very much for taking care of it :)
>> 
>>> It has been more than a year since the last upgrade, and mysql is adjusting schema for a table with ~150G data on a single VM instance.
>> 
>> 150GB? I’m very surprised there is so much data in our phab! That seems huge...
>> 
>> My guess is that this includes all the diffs for every revision of every review (as well as all the comments, etc), and it probably isn't as clever with diffs as for example git. Which quite soon adds up to huge numbers when you have tens of thousands of reviews.
>> 
>> Purse speculation of course, I have never looked inside phabricator (or for that matter, any other code-review tool).
>> 
>> --
>> Mats
>> 
>> — 
>> Mehdi
>> 
>>> Sadly, the progress bar isn't giving useful information (plus I am not a good system admin),  so I couldn't tell the ETA...
>>> 
>>> FYI: According to previous maintainer, it takes a couple of hours for the last upgrade, so this should be done within a few hours (hopefully!).
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 4:04 PM Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>> Is there any ETA?
>>> 
>>> -Krzysztof
>>> 
>>> On 9/29/2016 5:34 AM, Eric Liu via llvm-dev wrote:
>>> > That was a bad estimation. Database upgrade is taking time.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:03 AM Eric Liu <ioeric at google.com <mailto:ioeric at google.com>
>>> > <mailto:ioeric at google.com <mailto:ioeric at google.com>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     Hi all,
>>> >
>>> >     Phabricator(reviews.llvm.org <http://reviews.llvm.org/> <http://reviews.llvm.org <http://reviews.llvm.org/>>) will be down
>>> >     for ~30 mins for an upgrade. Sorry for the short notice.
>>> >
>>> >     Regards,
>>> >     Eric
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>>> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
>>> >
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
>>> hosted by The Linux Foundation
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org>
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160930/987fa71c/attachment-0001.html>