[llvm-dev] Upgrading phabricator

Eric Liu via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Sep 30 08:13:41 PDT 2016

@Alex I tried glancing through emails in llvm-commits, and I found
"[PATCH]" makes it easier to tell revisions from patches, and I guess
people are also used to "[PATCH]" after all these years :)

@Zachary Yes! This option can be configured in "Email Preferences" in your
personal setting, but I'm not sure if this should be disabled globally. For
me personally, I'd like to be notified when a patch I am following is

Although I am happy to make these changes if people want :)


On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:52 PM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:

Is there any way to disable emails when a revision is closed? I always find
those annoying, especially when it's a mass closing to clean out your
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 7:45 AM Alex Bradbury via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

On 30 September 2016 at 14:21, Eric Liu via llvm-commits
<llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback Aaron! :)
> I've disabled it. I think the annoying part really is the status (e.g.
> Request, Closed etc) in the tag, and I am wondering if a tag with just
> numbers like "(N Loc)" would be better. But I'm not really sure about the
> trade-off here.

I'd suggest that [PATCH] is a waste of screen real estate too - the
`Dnnnnn:` prefix makes it obvious. I do appreciate there's an argument
for having it for consistency with people who post patches directly to


LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160930/e18aad92/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list