[llvm-dev] Matthias` suggestion for "test-suite" tests that are broken at "-Ofast" and are difficult to "repair"

[Renato Golin via llvm-dev]

On 12 October 2016 at 19:33, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> I think it depends on what "problematic" means. I want to keep those that we can check by just using a larger (but still reasonable) tolerance, smaller number of iterations, etc. We should only disable the ones for which there is not another reasonable solution.

Right, that's ok. Means we'll investigate each individual test and
make sure the tolerances, sampling or disabling will be done in that
order, if all previous attempts failed.

cheers,
--renato