[llvm-dev] Using C++14 code in LLVM

[Zachary Turner via llvm-dev]

For anyone still on gcc 4.2.1, then I think this entire discussion is kind
of irrelevant, because they are already having to build a new toolchain to
compile LLVM, since the minimum is currently 4.7.  So for those people, I
would imagine 4.7 vs. 4.9 makes no difference?

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the table of the distrowatch page, but if
FreeBSD 11 has clang 3.8 as you say, why does distrowatch say FreeBSD 10
and 11 have clang 3.9
<http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=freebsd>?

On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 7:10 PM Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On 10/2/2016 6:09 PM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev wrote:
> > The BSDs don't seem as much of an issue.  FreeBSD 10 and 11 both have
> > LLVM 3.9 and GCC 4.9.  NetBSD 6.1.5 and 7.0 both have GCC 5.3 and LLVM
> > 3.8.  Open BSD has a very old GCC, but distrowatch claims that it also
> > has LLVM 3.8.
>
> FreeBSD 11 has clang 3.8.0.  There is gcc in the /usr/src/contrib, but
> that's 4.2.1.  There are still platforms that FreeBSD supports that have
> not finished moving to clang (from gcc 4.2.1).
>
> -Krzysztof
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161003/9a21cb43/attachment.html>